Where Some Ideas Are Stranger Than Others...
Back in early 2017, I found myself reflecting on the latest experiment in papering over past and present colonialism, a thing called "reconciliation" with Indigenous peoples here in the northern part of what is now labelled as canada on the maps. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC), which began in 2009 and released its report and "calls to action" in 2015, heralded an outpouring in mainstream canadian media. "Reconciliation," "improving the relationship," et cetera, ad nauseum. I had been reading and listening to this stuff for over a year. Indigenous writers and thinkers whom I respect struggled mightily to find a good path forward in this mess of media buzzwords. Ryan McMahon dedicated an entire season of his podcast Red Man Laughing to "reconciliation," for crying out loud. He seemed to come around to the idea a bit. A media blitz plus lots of federal feel good press releases set my reactions to high skeptical, so I watched, and waited, and listened, and read. Doing my best to reserve judgement. (Ha ha, see what I did there?) Well. It has been a long period of research, and here is the conclusion I have come to.
There is no reconciliation. That's right, folks who think you are white (many thanks to James Baldwin), there is no reconciliation. There will be no reconciliation. Period. There are many reasons why, but let's start with Sophie McCall's description of reconciliation in her book First Person Plural, since she whether or not she thinks she is white, she understands that she is not Indigenous and has given serious thought to how to interact with Indigenous peoples respectfully. "While reconciliation prioritizes the expiation of the colonizer's sense of guilt, it places the onus upon the colonized to end longstanding conflicts." The prioritization of expiating colonizers' sense of guilt is key here.
UPDATE 2021-08-07 - I have happened on a new article by Justin Podur, Canada is Waging All-Front Legal War Against Indigenous People. He runs the Anti-Empire Project website, which has serious coverage of Cuba, Haiti, Venezuela, the Philippines, Venezuela... it is impressive. It is also possible to view this article on CounterPunch, but the links are full of trackers and as a result don't work properly.
UPDATE 2021-08-09 - Further to this essay, the tyee has been running many solid pieces on the aftermath of the canadian indian residential school system. The most recent, by Daniel Heath Justice and Sean Carleton, is Against Residential School Denialism: Eight Ways to Identify and Confront Efforts to Undermine Indigenous Peoples' Harsh Experiences Under Canadian Colonialism.
UPDATE 2022-08-07 - The man held up as the leader of the catholic church showed up in canada recently to "apologize" to Indigenous peoples for the horrors perpetrated on them by catholic clergy and secular religious orders. Well, not really. He came to throw around some words and perform no actual deeds. Deeds like calling in the authorities and having every rapist, whomever that rapist's preferred prey – children, secular women, or nuns – to be defrocked, named in public, and clapped in prison and never allowed in a position of power over anyone else ever again. Deeds like disgorging the billions of money and stolen artifacts back to the people the catholic church has been ruthlessly stealing from for centuries while declaiming how "the poor will always be with us" and demanding that more and more money be raised to build another empty cathedral. That would just be a start. It's hard to have anything constructive to say about the formalized "catholic church" that opted to serve the most vicious forms of power a long time ago, all the way back when it opted to throw in its lot with Constantine.
UPDATE 2022-11-05 - I will have to write another piece with my findings about how various provincial, federal, and church authorities deliberately lied when making records about the kidnapped children in residential schools to make it as difficult as possible for those children to get home or their families to find them. This includes lying about their health status, and if they had died, where they were buried. To get a sense of just what the practical impact of these lies can be even when there may only be "one or two" of them, see William Osborne and Margaret Anne Lindsay's july 2021 article, The Three Sisters. There is an additional critique in this wrenching article, that of the pretence of open data created by "digitization."
Now let's go on to what the word "reconciliation" actually means. According to my OED, it refers to restoration of friendly relations between parties, or making "one view or belief compatible with another." In colonial states, there have been and are no friendly relations. What there have been and are, are Indigenous people engaging in resistance and damage control while non-Indigenous people continue pursuing their displacement and dispossession by every means possible. This includes non-Indigenous people who may never have consciously intended to engage in such behaviour in their lives, because this is something that comes from a systemic and structural not an individual, basis. At no time has there been any widespread effort on the part of non-Indigenous people, most especially those who think they are white, to make their own views and beliefs compatible with the views and beliefs of Indigenous people, even the basic ones like the right of Indigenous people to exist and have a future. The definition of "reconciliation" in my dictionary also refers to "making financial accounts consistent." When the money stolen from any Indigenous nation just in canada is returned with interest and a full and complete acknowledgement that it is not possible for Indigenous peoples to "surrender" their lands as a prelude to putting the land situation right and upholding treaties by the people who think they are white – let alone the other non-Indigenous folks who may or may not have realized what a mess they were getting into when they came here – then maybe the word might at least hand wave at that definition.
I appreciate that many readers might find what I'm writing here inflammatory and unfair. How dare I suggest that there is an ongoing effort to destroy Indigenous people, after all, that's in the past. Non-Indigenous people living in canada today had nothing to with those horrible actions, and people know those things are unacceptable and no one does that horrible stuff anymore.
You may not believe me, but I sincerely wish this was true. I wish that all the horrors and the systemic racism were truly in the past, with no connections to today, and that no one now is complicit with colonialism because canada isn't a colonial state anymore. Many people, especially those who think they are white, would fiercely disagree here. After all, they can point out that today there are no more residential schools, no pass system, it isn't illegal to practice an Indigenous religion, Indigenous people aren't being rounded up and forced onto isolated reserves and starved. And besides, according to more than one of my acquaintances who think they are white, look at all the good things the european invaders brought. They have a hard time coming up with specifics, referring mainly to "advanced technology." As if there was no advanced technology on Turtle Island before europeans came along. (Hint: There most certainly was.) I wish they were right, too. Except they are wrong. If they were right, none of the following things would be part of all of our lives today.
- The federal government estimates that the Indigenous population within canada is roughly 4% of the overall population. It is probably underestimating, but not by much.
- Hundreds of Indigenous communities lack basic, consistent access to clean water for drinking and washing.
- The most recent estimate of murdered and missing Indigenous women and girls by Walk 4 Justice activists within canada alone has now passed 4 232. There is no sign that this number is going to stop growing, and efforts by police to minimize the numbers are ongoing.
- Residential schools may be gone, but today more Indigenous children have been taken away from their families and imprisoned in the "child welfare system" (also see Teaching the Legacy of the 60s Scoop) than were in those schools. Social workers are quick to take away Indigenous children, any Indigenous children, status under the racist Indian Act not required. As of mid-2021, these numbers are even worse, so bad that even the current Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Carolyn Bennett has said out loud in the press that "There are more kids in care now than there were at the height of residential schools and it's unacceptable and harmful."
- The other way Indigenous children are targeted for removal from their families and communities is by law enforcement, which in the province of british columbia alone meant "Indigenous youth account for about 10 per cent of B.C.'s youth population, but 49 per cent of all youth locked up in 2019." This quote is from an article by Hiren Mansukhani at the tyee about the abuse of the widely recognized torture tactic of solitary confinement in youth jails.
- Despite being only about 4% of the total population within canada, Indigenous people make up over 20% of the federal prison population. That this is a product of systemic racism is now begrudgingly admitted.
- The racist, sexist Indian Act remains law in canada, including provisions that will inevitably redefine "status Indians" out of existence using a covert blood quantum system. (FYI, this piece of legislation has nothing to do with Indigenous rights or treaties.)
- Oh, and contrary to popular belief, the parts of the Indian Act declaring Indigenous ceremony illegal have never been officially repealed. They simply aren't printed as part of the act anymore, and aren't enforced because of effective and determined Indigenous resistance.
- To this day, canada refuses to admit that Indigenous peoples have never ceded their lands, nor has it upheld its part of any treaty it has signed with Indigenous nations, even according to the strictest letter of the versions of the treaties the federal government says it recognizes. If it had, there would be no "specific claims."
- Outsiders continue trying to impose a racist and racializing definition on Métis within canada, denying the reality of Métis history, culture, and relationship to the land. The effort to do the same to First Nations is enshrined in the already mentioned Indian Act. Inuit are engaged in their own struggle against the canadian state on this point as well.
- Heedless of intense, unremitting resistance to destructive and inappropriate projects intended to allow super-exploitation of "resources" ranging from metals to water by Indigenous communities, many of which see their lands and often their literal villages destroyed by them, governments at all levels work together with corporations to build them anyway.
- Out of at least hundreds of Indigenous languages spoken within canada before europeans arrived, only three are considered "healthy" today: Cree, Inuktitut, and Anishinabowin. Access to Indigenous language instruction is difficult to impossible for most Indigenous people living within canada, and most programs operate on shoestring budgets.
- "Aboriginal and treaty rights" remained outside of canada's constitution until 1982 when it was officially patriated. That was also the year that the official federal definition of "Aboriginal" was defined to include First Nations, Inuit, and Métis. For context, canada has officially existed since 1867.
- Despite the recent legal settlement between the federal government and the Métis represented by the Manitoba Métis Federation, the majority of Métis remain landless and the Red River Métis treaty with canada, which became the basis of the Manitoba Act, is still not acknowledged as a treaty by the federal government.
- In 2013, the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives found that 40% of Indigenous children within canada live in poverty. This has everything to do with persistent disadvantages that impact Indigenous access to good jobs and the good health necessary to succeed in them. If the lack of access to education, a safe home, and good food are overcome, there is always systemic racism left to deal with.
By the way, for those settlers still puzzled how the residential schools could have been bad if the last one didn't close until 1996, because they provided schooling, do feel free to read about what they were actually like for the majority of students, starting with the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's final report. Or you could consider Sto:Lo orator Lee Maracle's concise description from her book My Conversations With Canadians about the purpose and curricula of residential schools:
Removal was the object of residential school, and it was not for purposes of assimilation, and it was a crime. It was done to destroy the language, culture, and sensibility of Indigenous people. This is genocide. No academic or English language or mathematics or science courses were taught in the first one hundred years of those schools. Those would be the sort of courses that would justify calling it an assimilation program. Instead only the destruction of Indigenous language and knowledge was offered. Children worked and recited scripture when they were not being beaten, starved, or raped. When are rape and hunger part of an assimilation program? Only when it applies to us. Elsewhere in the world, it is genocide.
Being a residential school survivor adds insult to injury in canada, because that puts you and your children and grandchildren under additional surveillance by the various provincial and federal authorities that claim to be concerned for the health and welfare of children. This exponentially increases their opportunities to kidnap children from their families on flimsy pretexts. Stealing Indigenous children and preferentially placing them in non-Indigenous homes or warehousing them in hotels where traffickers wait outside to lure them away are genocidal actions.
So no, there is no reconciliation, and there will be no reconciliation, because these facts, and many, many more, show that on a systemic level, there are no friendly relations. On a systemic level, there is no effort going on to admit and accept that Indigenous people are not going anywhere, they are staying Indigenous, and colonialism is unacceptable and must end. On a systemic level, there has been and is no effort to "balance accounts." This reflects the mainstream definition of the term. It also reflects the real life facts. The trouble is systemic, so even though I do indeed have good friends who are not Indigenous, even friends who think they are white, and yes, they are good people, those relationships aren't reconciliation. This is still true despite the wonderful to see growing resistance by non-Indigenous people to colonialism and the systemic practices that oppress Indigenous people and are tweaked slightly every day for use against others who have been racialized or feminized relative to the "mainstream." To be clear, this resistance is effective, it's just not big enough to bring down the system quite yet.
What there is, is the possibility that people who think they are white may at last establish friendly and respectful relations with Indigenous peoples and nations within canada. Which means actual decolonization and the people who think they are white taking up the difficult and critical task of dismantling the systems of oppression, not just of Indigenous people, but also of women, of other racialized groups, and sex role stereotype defiant people living within canada. If those systems are allowed to persist in any form, they will continue to poison the well for everyone. The question then, is whether the people who think they are white will pursue that opportunity, which begins with rejecting the fictions of whiteness and reconciliation and acting on that. I know which answer I'm hoping for.